≪ Go to our review of Rain Boots - Women's

Hands-on Gear Review

The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport II Review

Price:   $170 List | $131.99 at Amazon
Pros:  Warm, Comfortable
Cons:  Expensive, poor traction, too warm for milder climates
Bottom line:  Best reserved for harsh, wet conditions, this model is too expensive and too warm for most uses.
Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Manufacturer:   The Original Muckboot Company

Our Verdict

The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport II is a super warm neoprene-insulated rain boot that doubles as winter footwear. As the name suggests, this product is suitable for cold, nasty weather conditions. When we tested it out in an icy Colorado stream, we couldn't feel a thing! Although this boot has been updated to come in pink and purple color schemes, it still has a rugged look, including a rubber toe box and a neoprene upper. Although this product killed it in our warmth and weather protection metrics, it didn't score very well in our traction or style metrics. Read on to see how the model we tested compares to other products in our review, including its most direct competitor, the Bogs Women's Classic High.


RELATED REVIEW: The 10 Best Rain Boots for Women

Our Analysis and Hands-on Test Results

Review by:
Amanda Fenn

Last Updated:
Saturday
December 26, 2015

Share:
One of the most expensive products in this review, The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport II provides more insulation than any other model we tested. It has a thick sole and measures 16.5 inches from the ground to the top of the shaft. Although it's not very stylish, it does work well in cold and nasty conditions, especially during the slushy time period when winter transitions to spring. We don't recommend it in temperatures warmer than 60 degrees.

Performance Comparison


A rain and winter boot hybrid  the Arctic Sport is ideal for cold weather chores.
A rain and winter boot hybrid, the Arctic Sport is ideal for cold weather chores.

Weather Protection


This product received top marks in weather protection. It measures 16.5 inches, which is less than an inch shorter than the Hunter Original Adjustable (the tallest product in our review). The Arctic Sport II has a small gap between the calf and the edge of the shaft; meanwhile the Bogs model has almost no gap, making the Arctic Sport a little better suited to those with wider calves. Both of these products are ideal for cold, nasty days when you have to face wet, dirty conditions (i.e. disgusting road slush or cold, muddy puddles). They are easier to clean and quicker drying than women's winter boots, but still provide protection from wet, cold conditions.

With one of the tallest shafts in our review  this boot offers superb protection from the elements.
With one of the tallest shafts in our review, this boot offers superb protection from the elements.

Comfort


There are some pros and cons associated with this product's comfort. Let's start with the pros: good arch support, cushiony insole, neoprene shaft that provides good mobility, and a fleecy lining that adds comfort. Now, on to the cons: sole is thick and stiff, it's one of the heaviest/bulkiest in the review, and there's a fair amount of heel slippage. Overall, we liked walking in the Bogs Classic High better because of its lower, more flexible sole, but the Muck Boots do provide more arch support and have the fleecy lining.

The supportive insole and footbed provide good comfort; however  this boot's heavy weight made it less pleasant for walking.
The supportive insole and footbed provide good comfort; however, this boot's heavy weight made it less pleasant for walking.

Style


The Original Muck Boot Company changed a handful of things about this boot when they released the women's specific version and its style was one of them. Although this product still looks quite rugged, it does have subtle molding to give the toe box shape and it now comes with both purple and pink accents.

We liked the Sport II's style better than the black unisex stylings of the original Arctic Sport. If pink's not your color  you can also opt for purple or black.
We liked the Sport II's style better than the black unisex stylings of the original Arctic Sport. If pink's not your color, you can also opt for purple or black.

Traction


When we went down to the creek for our big head-to-head traction tests, we were expecting The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport II to really do a great job. Unfortunately, it did not live up to our expectations. Shockingly, this product had quite poor traction, especially on ice and slippery wooden steps. We think this is partially due to its super thick, stiff sole. This product has very limited sensitivity and since the sole doesn't bend very easily, it's tough to pinpoint where you should place extra pressure for better traction. That said thanks to its deep treads, this product did have good traction over loose terrain.

Due in part to its thick sole  this boot did not perform well in our traction tests.
Due in part to its thick sole, this boot did not perform well in our traction tests.

Warmth


This product was the only piece in our review to earn a 10 out of 10 in warmth. We definitely think of this model as a winter/rain boot hybrid. It is fitted with 5 mm of insulative neoprene and an inner fleece lining. Additionally, its sole is super thick, which provides added protection from the cold ground. The manufacturer comfort rates this boot from -40 to 60 degrees. We can't comment on the super cold temperatures, but during the most recent snowstorm here in Colorado, the Arctic Sport II easily kept our testers toasty in 20F temperatures.

The warmest rain boot of the bunch  this product is as warm as some of the products in our women's winter boot review.
The warmest rain boot of the bunch, this product is as warm as some of the products in our women's winter boot review.

Fit


Our size 9.5 tester ordered a size 10 in this women's specific boot. Although she still experienced a bit of heel slippage, she felt like this boot was a good fit from front to back. There was a little spare room from side to side and on top of the foot, but this didn't make the boot feel overly sloppy.

Best Applications


This product is best for cold, rainy conditions or snowy weather. Since it's easy to clean and has deep tread, it also works well in mud and slush.

Ideal for messy cold weather chores  the Arctic Sport II is a great option if you don't mind shelling out $170.
Ideal for messy cold weather chores, the Arctic Sport II is a great option if you don't mind shelling out $170.

Value


One of the most expensive pieces in our review, the Arctic Sport II rings up at $170. This is $60 more than the Bogs Classic High, but the Arctic Sport II is also a bit warmer. We liked the Bogs model better overall and appreciated the savings it provides, but if you really need something that will be a bit warmer, the Muck Boots may better meet your needs.

Conclusion


A solid choice for a winter/rain boot hybrid, The Original Muck Boots Company Arctic Sport II works well in cold, gross weather. It lacks both style and traction, but provides more warmth than any other competitors.

We liked this updated women's specific boot better than its unisex predecessor. If you need a burly muck boot  this one is a great (if expensive) choice.
We liked this updated women's specific boot better than its unisex predecessor. If you need a burly muck boot, this one is a great (if expensive) choice.
Amanda Fenn


Where to Buy?

Seller Price sort asc Visit
Amazonon sale
$131.99  -  22% off! see it

Thinking about buying some gear we've reviewed? Help OutdoorGearLab out if you do. Just click on any of the above seller links and if you make any purchase, the seller will contribute a portion of the sale to help support this site. It won't cost you anything extra, and it's a simple way to help us fund our testing and reviews. Thanks!

  • Share this article:
You Might Also Like

OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: March 2, 2017
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (2.0)
Average Customer Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (1.0)

0% of 1 reviewers recommend it
Rating Distribution
2 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 0%  (0)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 50%  (1)
1 star: 50%  (1)
Sort 1 member reviews by: Most Recent | Most Helpful
Create an Account to Write a Review

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Mar 2, 2017 - 04:03pm
GGHArkey · Hiker · UK
I have had these boots for 6 months and two splits appeared at the bottom of one of the boots. I only noticed when my foot got wet when out dog walking. I contacted where I bought them from and they asked me to send a picture of the fault. This was then sent to Muck Boots. The response from Muck Boots was appalling. They stated that I had ripped the boots! This is categorically not the case. Previous to buying the Muck Boots I had a pair of Le Chameau wellingtons and they lasted me for 10 years. Admittedly they were more expensive than the Muck Boots but, at 89 pounds I certainly expected them to last much longer than 6 months. I would not recommend

Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this product to a friend.


Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...

Create an Account to Write a Review
 
Where's the Best Price?
Seller Price
Amazon $131.99  -  22% off!

*You help support OutdoorGearLab's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.


Follow Us


Unbiased.