< Go to Trail Running Shoes - Men's

Hands-on Gear Review

ALTRA Superior 3.0 Review

Superior 3.0
Price:   $110 List | $87.96 at Amazon
Compare prices at 6 resellers
Pros:  Zero drop, lightweight, wide toe box, improved sidewall durability
Cons:  Sizing and fit still a little off, adding rock plate insert affects fit
Bottom line:  A lightweight zero-drop shoe for the speedsters and minimalist runners out there.
Editors' Rating:     
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   ALTRA

Our Verdict

The Altra Superior 3.0 has been updated to fix a couple of the most glaring problems from the previous version, and otherwise remains basically the same shoe as last year's 2.0. We love this shoe as the only zero drop (or 0mm heel-toe drop) shoe in the review. It truly does feel different to run without added cushioning underneath the heel, and we recommend that runners of all abilities and experiences give this a try sometime. These shoes are the more minimalist and lightweight offering from Altra. For those interested in low-profile, very light, or zero drop, this is the shoe that we recommend.

New Version of the Superior - May 2017
The Superior 3.0, pictured above, is the latest model of this solid runner from Altra. The biggest changes to this new model are the reinforced side walls, which are intended to improve durability. We recently got our hands on this new model and began our testing. Until our comprehensive review is complete, the analysis in this review still reflects the previous model, the Superior 2.0, with which the new version has many similarities.


RELATED REVIEW: The Best Men's Trail Running Shoes of 2017


Our Analysis and Hands-on Test Results

Review by:
Andy Wellman
Senior Review Editor
OutdoorGearLab

Last Updated:
Thursday
September 8, 2016

Share:

The Superior 3.0 vs. the Superior 2.0


The Superior 3.0 is essentially the same shoe that it was last year with a couple of potentially notable improvements. The first thing that Altra did was reinforce the sidewalls of the upper with more durable ripstop fabric. The durability of this sidewall was a problem that we pointed out in last year's review, where we have seen many instances of complete blowout. Altra also made the shoe about size bigger this year, as last year's model certainly ran small. While it does fit noticeably better, we still feel like it is slightly short for the size through our initial testing of this new product. This didn't bother us at all until we put in the removable Stoneguard inserts.

Check out the side-by-side photos of the two models, with the latest 3.0 version on the left and the predecessor, the Superior 2.0, on the right.

Superior 3.0
 

Here's a summary of the key differences between the ALTRA Superior 3.0 and the previous version:
  • Reinforced Sidewalls — Altra beefed up the sidewalls of the upper with more resistant ripstop fabric.
  • Elastic Overlays Added to the Upper — Elastic overlays are added to the upper to increase support and durability.
  • Lateral Flare — A slight lateral flare on the outsole lugs is newly integrated. According to Altra, this modification increases stability and grip.
  • Strategic Rubber Removal — In order to lighten the weight of the shoe, Altra strategically removed some of the rubber. They claim to have tackled this without decreasing support.
  • New Look — You can identify the latest model by its new pattern and different color options. More demure hues like Navy, light gray and black are the color choices for the Superior 3.0.
  • Decreased Weight — Altra lists the weight per shoe at 9.2 ounces for the men's sample size (compared with our measurement of 10.15 ounces for the Altra Superior 2.0).
  • Sizing — In response to feedback about sizing issues, Altra resized the shoe to be about size bigger.

The below assessments reflect the extended testing and analysis of the previous version, the Superior 2.0. We are currently testing the latest version.

Hands-On Review of the Superior 2.0


The best feature of this shoe is predictably its zero drop, which provides unparalleled stability, amazing trail feel, and supports a natural running gait. It is recommended for runners who typically run in a high heel-toe drop shoe to transition slowly to zero drop shoes, either by running in them on a few short runs per week at first or by slowly working downward in terms of drop in successive pairs of shoes. Zero drop shoes, while anatomically more natural, often create more stress on the Achilles tendon and calves of runners who are not adjusted to them, and in some cases can lead to injury if a runner doesn't take the time to adapt properly.

Performance Comparison


The San Juan Mountains are littered with exotic trails that are carved out of natural rock shelves like this one  invariably by miners hoping to reach their stash over 100 years ago. Here we enjoy the Perimeter Trail above Ouray in the Altra Superior 2.0 shoes.
The San Juan Mountains are littered with exotic trails that are carved out of natural rock shelves like this one, invariably by miners hoping to reach their stash over 100 years ago. Here we enjoy the Perimeter Trail above Ouray in the Altra Superior 2.0 shoes.

Foot Protection


The Superior 2.0 comes with the unique option of a removable rock plate insert that they call the Stoneguard. This is an insertable piece of plastic that one slides in underneath the insole. While it does add protection to the shoe, the insert is merely a thin piece of plastic, not really a dedicated rock plate like other shoes feature. We also felt like with the Stoneguard insert added in, the fit of the shoe changes, and it becomes less roomy, especially in the toe box. We greatly preferred these shoes without the Stoneguard, and others that we talked to who run in them all claimed to normally run without it, like we did. For this reason, we chose to rate the shoe, in all categories, as if the Stoneguard was not present in the shoe.

The Superior 2.0 does not have a rock plate built into the shoe  but rather provides a "rockshield" insert that you can add underneath the insole should you like. We loved the sensitivity and flexibility of this shoe without the insert  and didn't feel like having it in place really stiffened things up very much.
The Superior 2.0 does not have a rock plate built into the shoe, but rather provides a "rockshield" insert that you can add underneath the insole should you like. We loved the sensitivity and flexibility of this shoe without the insert, and didn't feel like having it in place really stiffened things up very much.

Without the Stoneguard, we thought this shoe was a bit light on the foot protection compared to the rest of the shoes reviewed, and so gave it 6 out of 10 points. While it is nicely cushioned, it is certainly possible to take a sharp rock to the sole that would be felt roughly by the foot. The upper is thin and does not have any protective overlays, and the toe bumper is flimsier than most. Protection was this shoe's least impressive aspect, but it still scored slightly higher than the La Sportiva Helios 2.0.

Traction


Compared to the competition, we felt that the traction on this shoe warranted a score of 7 out of 10, roughly the same as the New Balance Leadville V3 or the Mizuno Wave Hayate 2. The Trailclaw outsole has a good selection of directional lugs, but much fewer than what is quickly becoming the norm. There are a handful of cutouts in the outsole that allows for greater flexibility and sensitivity, and while not the stickiest, we would call it sticky enough for scrambling and rocky terrain.

The outsole of the new Superior 2.0 (left) remains essentially unchanged compared to last years version (right). Altra calls this the "Trail Claw"and for having relatively low profile lugs  we think the grip is good.
The outsole of the new Superior 2.0 (left) remains essentially unchanged compared to last years version (right). Altra calls this the "Trail Claw"and for having relatively low profile lugs, we think the grip is good.

Stability


Stability is the best quality of this shoe, as you would expect from a shoe with zero drop and a very low stack height to go along with it. Not only that, but the shoe is designed with a very wide forefoot so that the toes and metatarsals can splay out to their full width upon landing and push off, allowing for the most natural, and stable, running platform of any shoe that we tested. In fact, no other shoe felt as stable as this one, and so we awarded it the full 10 points.

A characteristic of the Altra line of shoes is the very wide forefoot and toe-box. This is designed to allow your foot to splay out naturally when you land on your forefoot  as you tend to while wearing zero drop shoes. Chippy likes the look.
A characteristic of the Altra line of shoes is the very wide forefoot and toe-box. This is designed to allow your foot to splay out naturally when you land on your forefoot, as you tend to while wearing zero drop shoes. Chippy likes the look.

Comfort


This was a very comfortable shoe that never-the-less had a couple very minor things that we could complain about, and forced us to give it only 8 points instead of 9 like many others. Besides running slightly short, the fit was a bit too full, and even a little crammed if we wore the Stoneguard rockshield, which we therefore opted not to do. Our other complaint was that the outsole and midsole seem to be rockered at the front of the shoe, which has the effect of forcing our toes upward into the upper when wearing it. It is the only shoe where the tops of our toes are often in contact with the upper. Overall, a comfortable shoe, much like the ASICS GEL-FujiTrabuco 4 Neutral or The North Face Ultra Endurance, but not the most comfortable one we tested.

Weight


Without the rock plate insert, these shoes weighed a very low 20.3 ounces for a pair of size 11's. This was not as light as the La Sportiva Helios 2.0, but good enough for second best, roughly the same as the HOKA ONE ONE Challenger ATR 3 and the Mizuno Wave Hayate 2. These shoes are very light, and that is one of the best things about them. Their light weight helps solidify the feel of running the natural way. For reference, with the Stoneguard inserted into the shoe they weigh 22.6 ounces, still very light.

Lightweight  low to the ground  and natural feeling with their zero drop from heel to toe  the Superior 2.0 shoes will really inspire you to fly along on the trails.
Lightweight, low to the ground, and natural feeling with their zero drop from heel to toe, the Superior 2.0 shoes will really inspire you to fly along on the trails.

Sensitivity


Without a ton of foot protection to dissociate oneself from the feel of the trail, these shoes are among the most sensitive we tested. They give great trail feel and allow for a light and nimble stride, while at the same time still providing enough cushioning so that they are not a liability. Only the Mizuno Wave Hayate 2 and the La Sportiva Helios 2.0 were more sensitive than these shoes.

Best Applications


The Superior 2.0 will excel in short trail running applications. Due to the lack of foot protection, we can't recommend it for ultra type outings, although there will certainly be people who will love it for this length anyway. This is a shoe that will help you to run fast, but probably not the best choice for bombing long rocky descents.

Running near Cascade Falls on the Perimeter Trail around the town of Ouray  Colorado  in the Superior 2.0. Once some people switch to zero drop shoes  they never go back. We are quite so fanatical  but the feel is noticable and refreshing every time we put these shoes on.
Running near Cascade Falls on the Perimeter Trail around the town of Ouray, Colorado, in the Superior 2.0. Once some people switch to zero drop shoes, they never go back. We are quite so fanatical, but the feel is noticable and refreshing every time we put these shoes on.

Value


The Superior 2.0 still costs $110. A couple of years ago that would have been average in price, but it seems that it was one of the few shoes to not increase its price this year, and is now the lowest price shoe in the review. Since we think these are a unique and fantastic shoe, and the durability concerns seem to have been addressed, we think these shoes present a good value.

Conclusion


The Superior 2.0 by Altra is the only pair of shoes in this year's review that is zero drop. They present a remarkably different feel while running than any of the other shoes we tested. They are more sensitive than they are protective, meaning they will appeal to those with a low-profile or minimalist ethos or background. While not perfect, and not our absolute favorite shoe, we enjoy taking these out for a spin every so often.

The only zero drop shoe in our review (meaning the heel is the exact same height as the toes)  the Superior 2.0 is essentially the same shoe that we loved last year  with all of the little problems fixed. It no longer runs small and has stronger upper material to combat blow-outs.
The only zero drop shoe in our review (meaning the heel is the exact same height as the toes), the Superior 2.0 is essentially the same shoe that we loved last year, with all of the little problems fixed. It no longer runs small and has stronger upper material to combat blow-outs.

Other Versions and Accessories

  • Women's Superior 2.0 - $110 — women's version of the same shoe
  • Stoneguard Insert - $14.95 — replacement removable rock protection
  • Stability Wedge - $20 — removable insert designed to help support flat feet or over-pronators
Andy Wellman

  • Share this article:
You Might Also Like

Where to Buy?


Thinking about buying some gear we've reviewed? Help OutdoorGearLab out if you do. Just click on any of the above seller links and if you make any purchase, the seller will contribute a portion of the sale to help support this site. It won't cost you anything extra, and it's a simple way to help us fund our gear reviews. Thanks!

*Most retailers free shipping offers apply only to lower 48 US states using ground/economy shipping. See retailer's website for details.


OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: January 13, 2017
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (4.0)
Average Customer Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (5.0)

100% of 1 reviewers recommend it
Rating Distribution
2 Total Ratings
5 star: 50%  (1)
4 star: 50%  (1)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)
Sort 1 member reviews by: Most Recent | Most Helpful
Write a Review on this Gear

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Jan 13, 2017 - 02:27pm
p.db · Runner · Italy
I ran something like 120 Km with the Superior. Now, these are my favourite shoes. Simply amazing. Light, incredible traction, comfortable (ok, enough comfortable), and they're really different from any other shoe. There's a peculiarity… The SPACE. There is plenty of space inside these shoes, but they are firm also in fast changes of direction. No blisters, no problems with water, rocks, dirt, snow. They become dry really fast, not cold, not warm. The upper seems "light" but is very resistant. Nothing to say. A great, simple, fast shoe.

Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this product to a friend.
Help other readers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? 
Yes
 
No


Have you used the ALTRA Superior 3.0?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...

Write a Review on this Gear
 
Where's the Best Price?
Seller Price
Amazon $87.96  -  20% off!
Backcountry $109.95
CampSaver $109.95
Compare prices at 6 sellers >

*You help support OutdoorGearLab's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.


Follow Us

Other Gear by ALTRA

Unbiased.