The Best Men's Running Shoes of 2017

The market for running shoes is immense, and picking one pair from the multitude is tough. We evaluated 100+ models before testing the 11 best over three months to help you find the right pair. Our experts crushed dozens of miles in each product across the mountain roads and sandy beaches of Virginia, encountering warm days with bluebird skies as well as cool and wet ones. We weighed these model on our own scales, considered which ones add pop to each step, and studied comfort from mile one to mile ten and beyond. Our running fiends also looked at breathability, durability, and the comfort of the uppers when assessing these shoes. Compiling our in-depth field experiences and specific tests, we created a comparative review to narrow the options, no matter what type of runner you seek.

Read the full review below >

Test Results and Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 11 << Previous | View All | Next >>

Analysis and Award Winners

Review by:
Ryan Baham
Review Editor

Last Updated:
June 6, 2017

Updated June 2017
To keep up with the ever-changing market, we updated this review with the latest version of our Editors' Choice Award winner from Brooks. Improving on an already great design, the PureFlow 6 provides more comfort than its predecessor and no longer chafes where the tongue meets the ankle. Even better, it's $10 cheaper than the PureFlow 5! Also, since our original review, the Flex Fury 2 has been discontinued and the Saucony Kinvara 7 has beeen replaced with the Kinvara 8.

Best Overall Men's Running Shoe

Brooks PureFlow 6

Brooks Pureflow 6 Editors' Choice Award

at Backcountry
See It

Nice fit
Not the most durable
Lacks protection
Our Editors' Choice Award in 2017 goes to the neutral, moderately cushioned PureFlow 6. This versatile model balances the key aspects better than the rest, combining comfort, weight, durability, flexibility, breathability, and responsiveness to make this an unrivaled shoe. It's also the most comfort of all contenders, from the first mile through the last. The shoe's plush, wrap-around collar hugs the ankle and heel and has a snug-fitting, synthetic mesh upper. The lack of a midfoot trusstic allows full contact with the ground during landing, creates a more natural heel-to-toe transition for heel-strikers, and creates a smooth ride, complete with an innovative segmented crash pad. This cushy crash pad is polished off by nubs on the outsole that offer plenty of traction in all road conditions and allow for a responsive ride. Brooks released the PureFlow 6 in 2017 as a replacement to the previous PureFlow 5, and our reviewers are stoked this shoe just keeps getting better.

Read full review: Brooks PureFlow 6

Best Bang for the Buck

Saucony Kinvara 8

Kinvara 8 Best Buy Award

at Backcountry
See It

Very lightweight
Comfort for miles
Lacks robust support
Average durability
The Kinvara 8 wins our Best Buy Award, scoring highest in stability, durability, and responsiveness. As you probably know, many stability models can break the bank. The Saucony Kinvara maintains an affordable $110 retail price, which is the least expensive stability version in our group. This model provides many comfortable miles for each dollar spent. You can't go wrong with this shoe if you're an over-pronator on a budget looking for a high-stability road running sneaker. And at 16.9 ounces, this shoe is a top contender for both overall and racing flats, but in the end, it is a maximal contender, which serves a less broad community than other styles. It is still a superb, versatile shoe that brings a lot of value to the pavement. As of June 2017, the review is updated to include information about the Kinvara 7's replacement model, the Kinvara 8. This new model has a stripped down upper, an upgraded topsole, and is available in smaller sizes. Jump over to the individual review to learn more about these changes.

Read full review: Saucony Kinvara 8

Top Pick Award for Lightweight Racing Flat

Nike Flex Fury 2

Nike Flex Fury 2 Top Pick Award

at Amazon
See It

Solid ventilation
Second skin fit
Low support
Low durability
Low protection

Update - June 2017
The Flex Fury 2 is discontinued. While there are currently no plans for this model to be replaced or updated, you can still find this award winner at major retailers while supplies last.

The Flex Fury 2 is lightweight, minimal, and a versatile road shoe, snagging our Top Pick Award for its speediness. Jump into this light shoe and channel your inner gazelle. At only 17.2 ounces in a size 11, a 5mm heel-to-toe drop, and a reasonable amount of cushioning, it is resilient enough to provide comfort through daily runs, workouts, and even runs up to marathon distances. Runners who want to make a gradual move towards minimalism will find solace in the Flex Fury 2. It presents a considerable change for those who have always used a traditional road shoe, most of which have a 10mm or more heel-to-toe discrepancy. Remember to adjust gradually to footgear like this. We have done the abrupt transition thing and had the stress fractures of shame. So go slowly, do your homework on biomechanics and muscles, do recovery, and build yourself up over time. The Nike Flex Fury 2 puts a lot more stress on your lower legs and Achilles tendon in comparison to traditional trainers. Don't be surprised if your lower legs are super sore after the first few runs in these quick racers.

Read full review: Nike Flex Fury 2

Top Pick Award for Stability Shoe

HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 3

HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 3 Top Pick Award

at Backcountry
See It

Awesome cushioning
Solid support
Hefty shape
Limited protection
Our favorite stability model is the Clifton 3. Given the newest version's plush ride, upper comfort, high stability, and great out-of-box comfort, we rate the HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 3 as a better stability shoe overall when compared to the other road footwear. For the stability class, it's lightweight and comfortable. At 20.3 ounces per pair of men's 11, it's the same weight as the Brooks PureFlow 6, our Editors' Choice winner — and lighter than seven other pairs in our cohort. Often, shoes need a few miles to break in, but this is by far the most comfortable pair of pavement pounders tested straight out of the box, thanks to the compression-molded EVA foam cushioning in the midsole. With this unmatchable out-of-box landing comfort, well-cushioned upper, and creatively designed landing platform that guides each step back to a neutral position, this one comes highly recommended for all over-pronators.

Read full review: HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 3

select up to 5 products
Score Product Price Our Take
Editors' Choice Award
A top lightweight shoe that will comfortably carry you through a season or two.
Best Buy Award
An extremely versatile, lightweight shoe that will last for a season.
Top Pick Award
A light, fast shoe that will take you through a season.
Top Pick Award
A light, versatile maximalist shoe that will last multiple seasons.
A comfortable minimalist shoe that might need to be bought a size smaller and may last last seasons.
A very comfortable traditional neutral shoe that will last multiple seasons.
Not designed to fit all foot shapes, but well suited to those with short toes and big toes longer than the rest. Should last multiple running reasons.
A good stability shoe that will last multiple seasons, though not as comfortable as other shoes.
The most comfortable thing you've ever put your foot inside, but lacks in overall performance. It should still last for a few running seasons.
A novelty shoe to say the least. More show than function with this shoe, but still a solid, stable shoe that will last multiple seasons.
Standard running shoe whose uniquely high midfoot offset could appeal to some runners, but is otherwise unremarkable. It should last for a season or two.

Analysis and Test Results

Our testers are running fiends, and they put each model through the paces to test their performance abilities in a range of conditions and environments. We measured them on our scales, designed tests, and ran hundreds of miles in these products to tease out the differences between them. Our notes, experiences, and results were compiled into mutually exclusive metrics, which we describe below. We also highlight top performers in each category. The overall score, shown in the table above, for each model comes from a cumulative tally of the metrics, weighted according to their importance and relevance to this type of running footwear.

The running shoe lineup
The running shoe lineup


Deciding which model has the highest responsiveness is fairly simple to grade. We posed the question, "Which kicks give us the most propulsive feedback through the landing to toe-off phase in our gait cycle?" A more responsive design will often have a stiffer and minimally cushioned outsole which facilitates a propulsive "pop" feeling and avoids that running-in-mud feeling. The most responsive models on the market are racing flats with an integrated stiff midsole system.

For the most part, we prefer running in road footwear with higher responsiveness. But the stiff soles of responsive models like the Altra Torin 2.5 do a lot of the work for your feet, ankles, and lower legs that other highly cushioned models don't. This type is on the opposite end of the spectrum from a minimalist or barefoot model, and we believe can create weaknesses in those areas if used for too long. How long we can't say, and it depends on the individual. If you're looking to improve your lower leg and foot strength, then a model with less responsiveness is likely ideal for you.

The extreme flexibility of the lightweight Saucony Kinvara 7. This shoe weighs in at only 16.9 ounces per pair.
The extreme flexibility of the lightweight Saucony Kinvara 7. This shoe weighs in at only 16.9 ounces per pair.

We rate the Altra Torin 2.5 as the most responsive in the group, while the responsive feedback from landing to push-off in the Brooks Ghost 9 as well as the Saucony Kinvara 8 is well beyond what we feel from any of the other road running shoes we tested. From our first stride to the last, the Torin 2.5 provided us with solid propulsive assistance. This propulsive feel has to do with the EVA midsole with its A-Bound Top Layer and InnerFlex™ technology to give the shoe high responsiveness.

A moderately flexible forefoot and rigid midfoot to heel is what gives the Altra Torin 2.5 such high responsiveness.
A moderately flexible forefoot and rigid midfoot to heel is what gives the Altra Torin 2.5 such high responsiveness.

Even though we get this efficient roll and pop feeling while running in the Altra Torin 2.5, it isn't the fastest shoe in the group given its wideness and bulk, especially compared to the racing flats. At 20.6 ounces a pair, though, it's a good deal lighter than the Brooks Ghost 9 at 23.4 ounces a pair.

Landing Comfort

To the majority of runners testing out new shoes, landing comfort is the most important factor. To decide which design has the best landing comfort, we take into account comfort while running from the first mile through the last (at least six miles at a time). Out-of-box comfort is always nice, but it's not a deciding factor for the best landing comfort. It's never fun finding out halfway through an hour-long run that the shoes that were so comfy when you ran from one side of the shoe store to the other are now the most ridiculously regrettable things you've ever put on your feet and don't remember why you even run anymore. No one wants that.

We experienced that change in comfort with the Altra Torin 2.5, whose cushy midsole and comfortable insole made the first few steps and jaunt around the block feel great. But its FootShape Toe Box began to cause real pain in the second toe after a few miles, pushing the model to the bottom of our ranking. We considered the Torin 2.5 to be comparable to the Pearl Izumi EM Road N3 in its design and landing comfort, though the EM Road N3 did better in scoring because it did not face the same toe-jamming setback as the Torin 2.5. We felt that the EM Road N3 struck a nice compromise in this field because of its thick landing platform, which provided fair cushioning, but sitting atop the outsole is a stiff EVA Strobel board in the footbed, which gives some rigidity to the landing. We still felt that it was a middling shoe in terms of comfort. It is important to note that the EM Road N3 has an interesting design feature in its dynamic offset, where the midfoot stack is 4mm and 3.5mm higher than the toe and heel, respectively. While this did not add to the comfort of the landing, it could be a feature desired by some runners and should be considered.

Similar to the Torin 2.5, we found that the ridges of the Mizuno Wave Prophecy 5's Wave Plate Technology ended up feeling pretty annoying after a few miles and is hard to get used to. It could be okay for some runners, but it is not for everyone. While the uneven strike of the Mizuno also pushed it lower in our ranking, we found its overall cushioning and rebound pleasant enough that it scored better than average.

Unsurprisingly, a design with more cushioning typically scores higher in landing comfort. The usual formula for the best landing comfort is a balanced design that is not too cushy and not too firm. You need balanced cushioning to find consistent comfort. We find this with the Saucony Kinvara 8, which scored near the top of our measure. We consider the Kinvara 8 to be a maximalist shoe because of its thick, firm EVA foam cushioning with only 4mm of drop between the heel and toe. The thick stack make the landing very comfortable, but the foam is also somewhat rigid, so the foot does not sink into each step which would be a little more comfortable for the joints, but might sacrifice some transfer and responsiveness.

It is also worth noting that sometimes desired design qualities can outweigh the importance of landing comfort, as might be the case with the ASICS GEL-Nimbus 19. We felt that the landing comfort was average. Its lack of midfoot and forefoot cushioning make the overall landing unremarkable, but it focuses much of its padding on the heel and in its stability features like the Trusstic System® and Guidance Trusstic System®, which can nullify the importance of comfort. Similarly, running style matters because the model better suits a heavy heel-strike.

There are exceptions to the aforementioned balanced comfort rule, as seen in the HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 3, another maximalist shoe. With its thick EVA stack sitting at 24mm at the forefoot and 29mm at the heel was nothing but marshmallows and sheet cake on the feet, making it a favorite of marathon and ultramarathon runners and earning it a top spot in the landing category, which it shares with the more streamlined Brooks PureFlow 6.

Three ideal pressure zones within the segmented crash pad and a rounded heel help make the Brooks PureFlow 5 such a smooth ride. These features play a huge role in the success of Brooks running shoes.
Three ideal pressure zones within the segmented crash pad and a rounded heel help make the Brooks PureFlow 5 such a smooth ride. These features play a huge role in the success of Brooks running shoes.

When we finished our first run using the Brooks PureFlow 6 we knew it would be hard for another model to top its landing comfort. Indeed, we feel the Brooks PureFlow 6 is the most comfortable, fast, and well-balanced road shoe we tested, which is why the Brooks PureFlow 6 comes away with our Editors' Choice Award and earns the highest rating in landing comfort. It lands just a bit ahead of its more rigid cousin, the Brooks Ghost 9 (as we said, Brooks makes great soles).

For the midsole cushioning, Brooks uses what they call Biomogo DNA LT - a much more biodegradable DNA which responds to and conforms to everyone's feet independently, depending on their landing pattern. When the Biomogo DNA LT cushioning receives pressure from your foot during landing, it spreads through the midsole in reaction to the pressure.

As for the outsole of the PureFlow 6, Brooks uses their innovative segmented crash pad system, sometimes described as caterpillar-like. This unique outsole allows you to have full outsole ground contact that produces a smooth ride while dispersing impact energy. Taken together with its low heel-to-toe drop, 4mm, it makes the shoe a fast, ideal all-around shoe.

The other Brooks models in our lineup also use the segmented crash pad, the Ghost 9 and Glycerin 14. But whereas we found the PureFlow 6 and Ghost 9 to have great landings, the Glycerin 14 seemed to underwhelm. We attribute that to the high degree of cushion in the heel while skimping near the forefoot, which gives an overall uneven landing firmness. The heel sinks, but the forefoot feels the hard surface of the road or pavement.

A number of kicks engineered strike points on their outsoles, like the Nike Flex Fury 2 and Vibram FiveFingers V-Run. Though it seems minor, it does make a difference, particularly for forefoot runners where an extra millimeter or two of reinforcement under the ball of the foot or big toe will make the difference between a bruise or tear and a good run. These shoes were somewhat tougher to rate because their low profile, low stacks made them less comfortable than say, the Clifton 3, which has pillows for soles. So we took those things into consideration with all shoes reviewed: how do these feel relative to their respective field and style? But those considerations arose most notably with these two models because of their pared-down construction. Even so, we felt that the FiveFingers V-Run was better than average. The generous give of the UI foam making up the midsole of the Flex Fury 2 along with its pressure-mapped rubber pods pushed it up near the top of the ranking, behind the Clifton 3 and PureFlow 6.

Upper Comfort

The first thing we notice when trying on a new pair of road running shoes is the fit and comfort of the upper. An array of components come together to create a comfortable upper. When deciding on a score for this metric, we take into consideration the overall fit, snug or roomy, toe box fit, tongue position, seam and stitch design, lace eyelets, and heel counter rigidity and fit.

The Brooks Glycerin 14 grabs a spot in the top rating for this category. Its plush, conforming upper created one of the best feeling uppers in the cohort. The Glycerin 14 occupies the top spot along with the Saucony Kinvara 8. The Glycerin 14 has a well-balanced upper fit that's snug along the heel and midfoot while giving good room in the toe box. The heel support isn't as stiff as other stability models in the group, and we like that as well.

A plush heel collar and well designed inner lining contribute to the high upper comfort score of the Brooks Glycerin 14.
A plush heel collar and well designed inner lining contribute to the high upper comfort score of the Brooks Glycerin 14.

The Saucony Kinvara 8 uses its EVERUN Heel Insert and FLEXFILM in its upper to create a snug, conforming, natural fit. We had to place the Kinvara at the top of the ratings for a very different, but equally comfortable fit as the Brooks Glycerin 14. Whereas the Glycerin 14 created a nice home for the foot, the Kinvara 8 upper felt like it was part of the foot — very natural and comfortable. And just for the record, we removed the EVERUN Heel Insert and ran in the shoe with inserts from other shoes, as well as placed the EVERUN insert in other shoes. While the Kinvara 8 is still a good, comfortable shoe sans insert, the EVERUN insert does improve the ride.

While they did not score quite as high as the Kinvara and Glycerin 14, the Clifton 3, PureFlow 6, and Flex Fury 2 all sat just below the top two scorers. Each of the three focused on light, plush uppers, especially placing thick, soft padding along the heel collar and conforming mesh along the top of the foot and minimal heel-to-toe drops for a more natural foot position.

The Brooks Ghost 9, a more traditional shoe, also did quite well in the comfort category. Its more traditional design focusing on rigidity and support could have limited the comfort features relative to its two cousins, the PureFlow 6 and Glycerin 14, but even so, Brooks did a good job of including a padded heel collar and tongue.

Notice the traditional padding of the Brooks Ghost 9 on the left versus the extreme padding of the Brooks Glycerin 14 on the right.
Notice the traditional padding of the Brooks Ghost 9 on the left versus the extreme padding of the Brooks Glycerin 14 on the right.

The ASICS GEL-Nimbus 19 is similar to the Ghost 9 in its more traditional design, but it focuses more on stability as mentioned in the landing comfort section and that is also true for its upper comfort. The Gel-Nimbus is still better than average in comfort, but it has some features, like heavy padding in the heel and minimal padding throughout the rest of the upper, and a rigid heel counter for stability, which were annoying or uncomfortable. For a runner looking more for stability than comfort, those features might outweigh the need for comfort. The Mizuno Wave Prophecy 5 focuses on stability as well, but its upper is not as encumbered by stability features as the GEL-Nimbus 19 because most of those features are on its Wave Plate midsole. The Wave Prophecy 5 also has a more snug fit and lower heel counter, which together make for a more natural fit and contribute to its higher than average score and higher score than the GEL-Nimbus 19.

The Vibram FiveFingers V-Run was a very comfortable shoe whose score was the same as the Prophecy 5, just below the Ghost 9. It had a number of design issues that we felt detracted from its overall comfort, including slipping toes (the last two toes tended to slip out, while the first and second toe were tight), and a shoe heel that rides down or is pushed down by the foot. Even so, the shoe's polyester lycra mesh conforms very well to the foot and has a Drilex sock liner that feels like fleece on the bare foot, earning it an above average score.

The last two models in our lineup, the Altra Torin 2.5 and Pearl Izumi EM Road N3 are comparable shoes in their design and feel. Compared to your typical running shoe, these are comfortable shoes, but they are not as plush or smooth or snug as most of the other models in the review. They scored lower than all models except for the GEL-Nimbus 19, which has structural qualities that make up for its more moderate comfort. We placed the Torin 2.5 at the very lowest comfort level in our lineup because of its rigid FootShape Toe Box, but it would have otherwise been only slightly above average. And as mentioned in the Torin 2.5 individual review, the FootShape fits many foot shapes, but it is still rigid, and any toe tip pressing against it in a toe or forefoot strike will cause discomfort.


Running in a shoe that regulates the temperature of your feet during a run is important not just for comfort, but for the overall health of your feet. Uppers that breathe poorly can trap in moisture which could cause chafing, blisters, foot fungus, and other foot problems. Most models on the market have pretty decent breathability. Commonly, a sneaker with higher breathability comes with a more minimally designed upper and thin, light mesh materials.

If your feet regularly sweat during runs, we recommend looking into our picks for higher breathability. If you live in an area that rains often or are often running through creeks, you might want to consider a waterproof Gore-Tex version, if it's available. The models that provide this waterproof Gore-Tex are not as breathable as ones without, but they will keep your feet much drier during very wet runs. Because of their lack of breathability, we don't recommend Gore-Tex footwear unless you'll be running through creeks or heavy storms.

We give the highest breathability rating to the Vibram V-Run (they have large ventilation holes poked throughout their upper), the Saucony Kinvara 8, the Brooks PureFlow 6, and the Nike Flex Fury 2. Our feet return from runs much drier in these models when compared to all the other road shoes we tested, and they dry faster when wet. Of course, the tradeoff is that if the water is coming from the outside, these well-vented shoes are more permeable and will wet your socks, which is not always a favorable scenario when you aren't expecting a puddle run. The rapid drying of these shoes has to do with seamless and lightweight minimal uppers.

Given this minimal upper, the Vibram FiveFingers V-Run does a poor job of keeping moisture out and is not a great choice for intense winter conditions. The Kinvara 8, PureFlow 6, and Nike Flex Fury 2 are better options to keep your feet dry and protected across seasons and through the broadest range of weather conditions. The least breathable model is the Altra Torin 2.5 with its impermeable Footshape toe box which traps moisture and keeps just the toes, the moving external parts, nice and soggy.


No runner wants to feel like they are lugging bricks on the ends of their legs, making shoe weight an important factor when choosing the best road running shoe. Typically, a lighter shoe facilitates a natural foot strike, though some heavier models can still run better overall. Take note though; there is often a relation between lighter designs and less durability since many models will sacrifice durability for weight.

Aside from the Vibram FiveFingers V-Run, which sits at 9.9 ounces, the Saucony Kinvara 8 takes the cake for the lightest model in our review by about 0.3 ounces. At just 16.9 ounces per pair in a men's size 11, the Kinvara 8 edges out the 17.2-ounce Nike Flex Fury 2, which won our Top Pick for Lightweight Racing Flats (because the Flex Fury is a very low profile, streamlined shoe).

The extreme flexibility of the lightweight Nike Flex Fury 2. This individual shoe weighs in at only 8.6 ounces.
The extreme flexibility of the lightweight Nike Flex Fury 2. This individual shoe weighs in at only 8.6 ounces.

The Saucony Kinvara 8 falls on a fine line between road trainer and racing flat. It is a versatile sneaker that can be used as either type of shoe interchangeably. It offers plenty of cushioning and protection to use as a daily trainer, while also being lightweight and responsive enough to break out for workouts and road races all the way up to the marathon distance. We also love how grippy the Saucony Kinvara 8 outsole feels to us on the road. We feel this is due to the segmented, triangular lugs on the outsole.


When you fork out over $100 bones on a new pair of road footgear, you want to make sure they last for a certain number of miles. We use a few different factors when rating the durability of the models in our test group. Ideally, a few hundred miles should be logged in each pair for an accurate sense of the rate of wear (a few runs a week for a year). Taking note of the wear we observed through logging 15-plus miles in each pair, we were able to get a good idea of the life of each model. We also researched hundreds of user reviews looking for personal feedback regarding the durability and last of the shoes. When rating the durability, we also take into account the design, outsole rubber density, mesh upper thickness, and upper design.

We give the highest durability rating to the Mizuno Wave Prophecy 5. Every test model besides the Wave Prophecy 5 and Vibram FiveFingers V-Run uses a foam cushioning system. Vibram uses your foot as the cushioning, though they say it's Vi-lite and EVA. Mizuno uses their Wave Plate Technology on the Wave Prophecy, which produces a stiff, rigid, and durable midsole unit. Due to its rigidity, we feel the "breakdown" of this midsole will occur at a much later stage when compared to the other models we evaluated.

The Bottom Line

Our two favorite racing shoes together. The Nike Flex Fury 2 (left) is the fastest and one of the lightest shoes we tested and earns our Top Pick award. The Brooks Pure Flow 5 (right) is our Editor's Choice winner and the most well-rounded road shoe we tested.
Our two favorite racing shoes together. The Nike Flex Fury 2 (left) is the fastest and one of the lightest shoes we tested and earns our Top Pick award. The Brooks Pure Flow 5 (right) is our Editor's Choice winner and the most well-rounded road shoe we tested.

We have logged more than 15 miles in each of our 11 test models, which has given us a base for evaluating running shoes. After this extensive research, we have found some favorites, but this is still fairly subjective. Keep in mind that everyone's feet are different. If our favorite doesn't fit your foot (or, as in the case of the Altra Torin 2.5, our feet don't fit your favorite shoe), you many want to explore some of the other models that we tested to find the proper footwear. All-in-all, each model that we tested is worthy and we are sure there is something for everyone in our test field.

Make sure and find the appropriate fit and style of running shoe for your feet and running style to enhance your performance and reduce the chance of injury.
Ryan Baham

  • Share this article:

Follow Us


You Might Also Like